Lately I have been thinking about fitness in terms of
specializing and generalizing. With the increased popularity of sports like mixed martial arts that draw on
multiple sports or types of fitness, it seems that generalizing is gaining
popularity. This is somewhat of a false distinction, I admit. Even in a
“specialized” sport like baseball, multiple skills are required. Likewise, MMA
— which draws on the sports of wrestling, jujitsu, and kickboxing, among others
— does not require every fitness capability.
Still, I think there is a difference between sports like baseball
and MMA. I have also been wondering whether specializing vs. generalizing is
analogous to family medicine vs. a specialty field like neurosurgery. Rightly
or wrongly, neurosurgeons seem to enjoy more prestige than family
practitioners. In general, do specializing athletes enjoy more prestige than generalizing
athletes? If so, are the tables turning?
In a few weeks, I will post an interview with Marcus
Taintor, a Duluth, Minnesota-based ultramarathon runner. Here, I share my
interview with Britt Ringstrom, a CrossFit athlete and personal trainer, whom
I met with in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, on August 14.
Britt Ringstrom
View of Athletic Trainers
My first question for Ringstrom
was whether athletic trainers look down on one method (specializing or generalizing) or
prefer one, with the acknowledgment that it is a hard question to answer
definitively. “Being an all-around athlete is not everyone’s goal,” Ringstrom
replied. Personal training is really about helping an individual reach his
goal. But, Ringstrom added, “This doesn’t mean we wouldn’t want to try to get
him better in other areas.” One of the things she likes about CrossFit, which
she called “the works,” is that it prepares you to be “constantly ready for
whatever’s thrown at you.” Ringstrom has found that many of her clients have
broadened out from what they came to her for, weight loss being a common
initial goal. She mentioned, though, that many trainers do believe that training
method x (power lifting, for example)
is the only way to train.
Sacrifices and Bonuses
Next, I asked Ringstrom about the sacrifices she has had to
make in specific areas to do CrossFit, and about the unexpected bonuses there
have been. She first explained that CrossFit is humbling. Gymnastics is one
area that has been particularly hard for her. She and other CrossFit athletes
have to re-teach their bodies how to do things. At the same time, they realize
that things they thought they’d be fine at, they’re actually not. For example, Ringstrom
had a solid background in power lifting, whereas pullups have been a challenge.
Ringstrom at the
2010 Elite Barbell AAPF Power Meet
Regarding sacrifices, specifically, she mentioned losing
strength — though she has gained muscle endurance, she has lost some strength
of the power or Olympic lifting type. She has also started to do intermittent
fasting to drop weight, in order to make pullups easier. As far as unexpected
bonuses, Ringstrom has been improving areas that haven’t always been her
strengths. She has learned she can push herself much further than she realized,
especially in competition, which she
considers “the best time to learn.”1 Reflecting on her experience so
far in competition, she said, “As scary and uncomfortable as it can be, I
learned a lot.” She also enjoys learning additional aspects of familiar fields,
and acquiring a deeper understanding of techniques, such as the technicality of
Olympic lifts.
Advantages of Generalizing
When I asked Ringstrom whether one or the other (again,
specializing or generalizing) seems to have inherent value — or, all things
considered, whether one is better — she answered that focusing on all-around
fitness is better, providing three reasons. First, it pushes you both
physically and mentally. Second, you’re ready to take on anything, even in
real-life situations. In CrossFit, for instance, you’re learning and practicing
very functional movements like squats that you do every day. Third, there is the feeling of completing a
workout that seemed impossible. Despite her preference for generalizing, Ringstrom
admitted CrossFit isn’t for everyone. “Some people live and breathe CrossFit,” she
said, “but it’s simply a tool. It’s a way
to live, but not the only way to live.”
Ringstrom at the 2012 CrossFit
North Central Regional in Illinois
Generalizing Gaining Respect
Finally, I asked Ringstrom if she thinks generalizing is
gaining more respect. Yes and no, she replied. “There’s still a large
population of gurus, like the kettlebell world and body builders, who make fun
of CrossFit. Some CrossFit athletes sacrifice form, and that’s looked down on.
And it can be seen as an ADD sport.” When we talked briefly about the
trendiness of MMA and how more and more MMA athletes are generalizing, Ringstrom
agreed that generalizing might turn out to be something of a trend. She pointed
out again that regimens like CrossFit are not for everyone, citing football
players as the kind of athletes who wouldn’t benefit from many of the
components of CrossFit.
Conclusions
As I reflect on my conversation with Ringstrom, I appreciate
her open-minded attitude about CrossFit and generalizing. From the beginning of
my inquiry into this subject, I have never felt strongly about one side over
the other, although I am drawn more to generalizing. As she states, all-around
fitness — to the level of a CrossFit athlete, especially — is not everyone’s goal.
I agree with nearly all Ringstrom said, one quibble being that two of the
advantages she gives to generalizing (pushing you physically and mentally, and
the feeling of completing a seemingly impossible workout) seem to apply equally
well to specializing. I look forward to getting a specialist’s view of things,
and to writing a more research-based third post to wrap up my analysis.
1. For an opposing view about
the value of competition, see the work of Alfie
Kohn.